Because because because
June 7, 2009
Q: Can you tell me a sentence in which “because” is used thrice in succession?
This was a question asked by my friend some 15 years ago(when I was in 4th standard).She told me the answer and then we both asked this question to our teachers and friends.Everyone failed.Asking a question which even teachers fail to answer.What else should we need to get a hero image??So with this question we were heroes in 4th standard for some time.
Yesterday it came to my mind without any reason.Thought to put it down for those who haven’t heard it.Give a try first and if you fail to get the answer go ahead….
Ans: No sentence starts with because because because is a conjunction.
June 7th, 2009 at 19:00
ha ha…
But I couldn’t give it a try with Because because Because’s ANSWER caught my eyes from right beneath!
June 8th, 2009 at 19:00
Kripa,
You are intelligent.You are a hero now
June 11th, 2009 at 19:00
Who was that friend..?
June 11th, 2009 at 19:00
Click on “friend” and you will find her blog
June 12th, 2009 at 19:00
Did you know about “Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo” ?
June 12th, 2009 at 19:00
That wikipedia page contains links to more of the kind.
June 14th, 2009 at 19:00
Niyaz,
I have read that “Buffalo” article earlier.
Really interesting one!
June 15th, 2009 at 19:00
@Niyaz
That one is cool
…
“”Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.” is a grammatically correct sentence used as an example of how homonyms and homophones can be used to create complicated constructs.”
Can we now take it to see that 1=2 is mathematically correct!?
Now twisting it a bit more to see that you=I is also correct!
I remember seeing a great thinker’s words some time somewhere. It was saying “You and I are one”! Let me paraphrase what he/she was trying to say -
“All the thieves, murderers, devils, they all are in me. There is unjust happening because someone has sacrificed his goodness so that I may be a good person. When that says a ‘law of balance’ – I can see you inside me. Then who can I hurt? Who can I kill? Who can I injure? Whom shall I fear? Whom shall I be jealous of? ”
I will keep myself silent if you ask me if ever that’s practical! But I believe what the thinker was trying to say is simply great!
Where all these are pointing to? To see world as a single entity – with an infinite circle whose circumference is nowhere?! I don’t know!
Well from ‘Because because because’ to ‘single entity’!! I know I have totally deviated from the main track! Am I not? Bad me! I know I am always like this!
(Theories are always proved. I am not trying to contradict something here! Please do take it lightly in the right sense!
)
December 9th, 2009 at 19:00
That’s cool… The blog and the comments were very informative.
December 9th, 2009 at 19:00
Vimal,
Danx
Thanks to Kripa and Niyaz too